Close

THERMO Spoken Here! ~ J. Pohl © ~ 2019 | www.ThermoSpokenHere.com (D5800-208) |

Pressure cooking is largely an industrial process but many restuarant kitchens also pressure cook **(PC)**. Thorough analysis of a pressure cooker can be tedious because their events are transient. Usually an open-system is used.

At the beginning of operation a **PC** contains a mixture: water and air and that to be cooked (we model as water).
It is possible to avoid these difficulties by "starting the problem" at a special time after the cooker has been heated on the stove, has attained its operating pressure of 175 kPa, and has expelled all air. Below is an alternate solution of this example. Read about this solution below:

Before we begin, it is helpful to realize that in thermodynamic analysis there is no specific, easiest way of solution. This is to say there is no specific "place" to begin and steps need not be done in any order. Analysis involves mass, state (initial and final), energy, property equations, heat, work, characteristics of the event and solution techniques. There are many paths to the solution of any thermo problem. Below, for this pressure-cooker, one path to solution is demonstrated one way.

**EVENT:** The pressure cooker (water within the interior volume as system) involves changes of mass and energy. The mass equation is easier than the energy equation. Therefore we develop the mass equation first. The generic mass equation (suited for all systems and all events) is:

(1) Generic mass equation. |

This is a first order differential equation with time as the independent variable. The event of this cooker is "start-stop" in nature. We identify the "start" time as t = 0+. The event is stated to end later, after 30 minutes; t = 30 min. So we integrate between those limits.

(2) Integration between limits of event time are applied. |

The term left of equality integrates immediately!

(3) 3 |

Inspection of the integral right-of-equality reveals that it can be integrated provided the time dependence of its integrand, the rate of mass leaving the cooker can be specified over the 30 minutes of the event. That is, does more mass leave initially and less later or what? Since this time-dependence is not known, must our analysis end here? With any analytic situation such as this, an engineer makes every effort to get some manner of answer. One technique applied to integrals the integrands of which are unknown is apply the Mean Value Theorem of calculus. The steps are as follows:

Replace the time dependent integrand, [m-dot_{out}(t)] with its "average," [m-dot_{out,avg}], then integrate. So what we did is replace a time dependent term we did not know with another term we don't know. The "left-of-equality" integrates. There is mass initially and mass later. As simple as that!

- The function we do not know is the mass out [or m-dot
_{out}(t)], over the time of 30 minutes.

In the above equation the product "**m-dot _{out,avg}** times

These steps to arrive at the above mass equation are used for many problems. For this Pressure Cooker, the authors have made it clear that the initial state of the water is two-phase. It is not known whether the second (final state after 30 minutes of heat) will be two phase or all vapor. Consequently,
**assume:** the second state is two phase, then extend the mass equation:

[m_{vapor,2} + m_{liquid,2}] - [m_{vapor,1} + m_{liquid,1}] = δ_{mass out} | (5) 5 |

Properties of Waterp = 175kPa |

T_{sat} = 116°C |

v_{f} = 0.001 m^{3}/kg |

v_{g} = 1.00 m^{3}/kg |

u_{f} = 487 kJ^{3}/kg |

u_{g} = 2038 kJ^{3}/kg |

h_{f} = 487 kJ^{3}/kg |

h_{g} = 2701 kJ^{3}/kg |

In this case the initial state is known to be two phase water at 175 kPa with a volume of 0.006 m^{3} and a mass of 1.0 kilograms. Immediately we have:

m_{vapor,1} + m_{liquid,1} = 1.0 kg
| (6) 6 |

kkkkkkkkkkkkk

For the initial state:

m_{vapor,1}v_{vapor} + m_{liquid,1}v_{g} = 0.006m^{3} or
| (7) 7 |

() |

**m**_{vapor,1} (**0.001**m^{3}/kg) + **m**_{liquid,1} (**1.00**m^{3}/kg) = **0.006** m^{3}

So having done all we can with the mass equation we see we have three equations with five unknowns. The equations are:

**(1)** Initial mass of the system:

m_{vapor,1} + m_{liquid,1} = 1.0 kg
| (7) 7 |

**(2)** Volume of the system:

m_{vapor,1} (0.001 m^{3}/kg) + m_{liquid,1} (1.00m^{3}/kg) = 0.006m ^{3} | (8) 8 |

**(3)** Mass Equation for the Event:

() |

[**m**_{vapor,2} + **m**_{liquid,2}] - [**m**_{vapor,1} + **m**_{liquid,1}] = **δ**_{mass out}

The unknown terms are:

() |

**m _{vapor,1}**,

Next we address the energy equation.

() |

For the pressure cooker...

(i) Thee is only water so drop the 1^{st} and 2^{nd} summation signs (Σ).

(ii) The "in" terms do not apply.

(iii) Constant volume cooker has no "dV" hence no "pdV" work."

(iv) Kinetic and potential energy changes will be negligible.

(v) A ssume there is no heat to the surrounding space. Drop the summation (Σ).

With these facts about the system, our equation reduces to this:

() |

So separate the variables and integrate the equation.

() |

() |

Hence, with energy, we have 4 equations and 5 unknowns. These equations are:

() |

**(1)** Initial mass of the system:

m_{vapor,1} + m_{liquid,1} = 1.0 kg

**(2)** Volume of the system:

m_{vapor,1} (0.001 m^{3}/kg) + m_{liquid,1} (1.00 m^{3}/kg) = 0.006 m ^{3}

**(3)** Mass Equation for the Event:

[m_{vapor,2} + m_{liquid,2}] - [m_{vapor,1} + m_{liquid,1}] = δ_{mass out}

**(4)** Energy Equation for the Event:

[m_{vapor,2}u_{vapor,2} + m_{liquid,2}u_{liquid,2}] - [m_{vapor,1}u_{vapor,1} + m_{liquid,1}u_{liquid,1}] = δ_{mass out}h_{mass out}

The unknown terms are:
**m**_{vapor,1},
**m**_{liquid,1},
**m**_{vapor,2},
**m**_{liquid,2} and **δ**_{mass out}.

So we have 4 equations and 5 unknowns. This cannot be solved. We need as many independent equations as there are unknowns. What is the new equation we need? Answer: the second volume is also 0.006 m^{3}.

Volume of the system in the second state:

**(5)** m_{vapor,2} (0.001 m^{3}/kg) + m_{liquid,2} (1.00 m^{3}/kg) = 0.006 m ^{3}

The numbers are not important. There are sufficient equations to calculate the unknowns. We leave it here!